Participate in the Governance of DIA

**Treasury Vote Concluded – Core Team Proposal Approved** The 2026 DIA DAO Treasury Vote has concluded. The core team proposal was approved with 98.85% community support. Thank you to everyone who participated in this governance process, and special thanks to Ahmed and Hypolithe for submitting community proposals and Alex for contributing to the discussion. We appreciate the thoughtful engagement from all sides. Implementation of the approved treasury allocation will begin in 2026 as outlined in the proposal. **View the final results:** [https://snapshot.box/#/s:diadao.eth/proposal/0x04fb7d4868749484be59b734f2e937b59bf187019f22eb5cc168b00b1ccd4d17](https://snapshot.box/#/s:diadao.eth/proposal/0x04fb7d4868749484be59b734f2e937b59bf187019f22eb5cc168b00b1ccd4d17) Best regards, Anze, Community & DAO Lead

The proposal was added to the Snapshot vote and is labeled under “Community Proposal #1”. [The Snapshot vote](https://snapshot.box/#/s:diadao.eth/proposal/0x04fb7d4868749484be59b734f2e937b59bf187019f22eb5cc168b00b1ccd4d17) is now live.

The proposal was added to the Snapshot vote and is labeled under “Community Proposal #2”. [The Snapshot vote](https://snapshot.box/#/s:diadao.eth/proposal/0x04fb7d4868749484be59b734f2e937b59bf187019f22eb5cc168b00b1ccd4d17) is now live.

Thank you for the detailed points, Alex and Anze. I will address them clearly so the community understands why this proposal went up. Firstly i support the team’s proposal fully. This airdrop framework only applies if the community decides to vote for an airdrop. In that situation, I want the right users rewarded, not sybil farms. 1. Eligibility are now defined and measurable. These thresholds remove inactive users, remove test accounts, and remove sybil setups. This ensures that only real users with real network involvement enter the list. 2. The number of eligible users will be clear On chain queries will produce the exact counts. Nothing stays unknown. Everything is verifiable. The community gets a clean dataset before any vote proceeds. 3. **A small user base does not mean the proposal is unfair Lasernet is under 9 months old. Early users engaged when activity was low and risk was higher. They provided traction at a stage when adoption was uncertain. APY is yield for staking. Early participation was contribution. These are different and should be treated as different.** **Rewarding early contributors is not double paying. It acknowledges users who helped the network bootstrap.** 4. Treasury impact is controlled The allocation is fixed at *91,500 DIA which is 10%* of the requested amount. It is targeted. It does not interfere with long term plans. It does not dilute broader strategic spending. It applies only if the community votes for an airdrop. The proposal does not force an airdrop. It only sets rules so that if the community wants it, the distribution is clean and fair. 5. There was no rush and no urgency The goal was clarity. If there is an airdrop vote, the distribution should not go to sybil farms and random wallets. It should go to users with real economic involvement. The proposal gives structure. Without structure, the process is broken. This keeps the ecosystem aligned with fairness and verifiable contribution. **To the community members who want an airdrop, this framework protects you from a sybil dominated outcome. To the members who support the team proposal, this framework does not interfere with it.**