Supply across all stablecoins
All 15 stablecoins combined
Share of total stablecoin supply
#56 of 98 issuers by supply
Share of non-USD stablecoin supply
of 74 non-USD stablecoins on the map
Stablecoins minted
median issuer: 1
Chains
read onchain, #61 of 98 issuers
Onchain FX protocol anchored on Celo whose contracts mint stablecoins in 15 currencies (USD, EUR, GBP, JPY, BRL, COP, PHP, AUD, CAD, ZAR, NGN, KES, XOF, GHS, CHF); 12 are counted against the Mento Reserve and GBPm, JPYm and CHFm are borrowed against USDm in CDPs.
Mento's protocol mints stablecoins in 15 currencies.
It is a protocol rather than a company in the sense the other large issuers are. There is no bank relationship behind the tokens, no custodian to name and no reserve account for an outside firm to examine. Its Reserve holdings and operations are onchain and verifiable, which is a genuine strength, and it also means the questions worth asking about it are completely different from the ones worth asking about a fiat issuer.
Sources: Mento blog: Mento Expands Global Onchain FX Access (6 June 2025), Mento docs: The Reserve, Mento Reserve dashboard
All 15 stablecoins Mento mints, largest first.
| Coin | Peg | Backing | Onchain supply | Chains | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USD | Crypto collateral | 16.0M USDm | 86% | ||
| EUR | Crypto collateral | 1.4M EURm | 9% | ||
| GBP | Own-token / algorithmic | 265.8K GBPm | 2% | ||
| BRL | Crypto collateral | 1.1M BRLm | 1% | ||
| JPY | Own-token / algorithmic | 11.5M JPYm | 1% | ||
| CHF | Own-token / algorithmic | 52.1K CHFm | <1% | ||
| KES | Crypto collateral | 8.7M KESm | <1% | ||
| COP | Crypto collateral | 105.6M COPm | <1% | ||
| PHP | Crypto collateral | 1.6M PHPm | <1% | ||
| GHS | Crypto collateral | 273.0K GHSm | <1% | ||
| NGN | Crypto collateral | 29.0M NGNm | <1% | ||
| AUD | Crypto collateral | 22.9K AUDm | <1% | ||
| XOF | Crypto collateral | 5.4M XOFm | <1% | ||
| CAD | Crypto collateral | 965 CADm | <1% | ||
| ZAR | Crypto collateral | 11.1K ZARm | <1% |
Summed across all 15 stablecoins of the Mento protocol, each dollar counted once. Over 30 days, DeFiLlama's circulating supply of these stablecoins changed -2.1%, against -3.1% for all stablecoins on the map.
Supply of every coin of the Mento protocol, summed by chain from DIA's own totalSupply() reads of the verified contracts. Each coin's tokens are converted to dollars at DIA's price for that coin, or split pro rata from its market figure where DIA has no price, so coins in different currencies can share one column. Wrapped coins are left out: their supply is already inside the coin they wrap. Each chain shows the same amount as the chain row on each coin's own page.
US$18.6M
Read on 2 chains, all in the total
DeFiLlama circulating supply in USD, grouped by each stablecoin's peg currency. Coins DeFiLlama does not record are not counted.
Source: DeFiLlama circulating supply Updated
In DIA's latest read, the 8 stablecoins of the Mento protocol with a peg reading sit within 49 bps of their peg. USDm's typical daily move over the last 90 days was 30 bps.
Today is DIA's latest daily read of each stablecoin's price against one unit of its peg currency, in basis points: 100 bps is 1% away from the peg, above (+) or below (-).
Typical daily move is the standard deviation of the daily gap between the price and the peg over the last 90 days. Largest move is the single day in the last 12 months furthest from the peg. Both come from daily closes at 00:00 UTC (DeFiLlama, with CoinGecko where DeFiLlama has no price) and match the figures on each stablecoin's own page.
EURm, GBPm, BRLm, JPYm, CHFm, KESm, PHPm, GHSm, AUDm, CADm, ZARm are priced through a daily exchange rate fixed at a different time of day from the stablecoin's close. That widens the 90-day and largest figures, so they are not comparable with the USD stablecoins' figures.
The largest move leaves out days when most other stablecoins of the same currency moved the same way: that move is the exchange rate, not the stablecoin. Left out: EURm 17 days, GBPm 4 days, CHFm 39 days, AUDm 17 days, CADm 1 day. The same days are left out on each stablecoin's own page.
XOFm shows today's deviation only. DIA has no daily price history for it yet.
Attestation cadence is how often an independent accountant's report covers the reserves, where one is published. A stablecoin with none shown has no cadence published.
Stablecoins whose value rises by design, such as savings wrappers, have no peg figures. Their price is a yield curve, not a peg.
| Stablecoin | Today | 90d | Largest | Attestation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −3 bps (−0.03%) | 30 bps | −132 bps (−1.32%) | ||
| −12 bps (−0.12%) | 2402 bps | +21775 bps (+217.75%) | Continuous proof of reserves | |
| −29 bps (−0.29%) | 20 bps | +330 bps (+3.30%) | Continuous proof of reserves | |
| −5 bps (−0.05%) | 277 bps | −1529 bps (−15.29%) | Continuous proof of reserves | |
| 74 bps | −180 bps (−1.80%) | Continuous proof of reserves | ||
| +117 bps (+1.17%) | Continuous proof of reserves | |||
| +42 bps (+0.42%) | 62 bps | −209 bps (−2.09%) | Continuous proof of reserves | |
| Continuous proof of reserves | ||||
| −23 bps (−0.23%) | 16 bps | +7041 bps (+70.41%) | Continuous proof of reserves | |
| −3 bps (−0.03%) | 87 bps | −200 bps (−2.00%) | Continuous proof of reserves | |
| Continuous proof of reserves | ||||
| 54 bps | +289 bps (+2.89%) | Continuous proof of reserves | ||
| +49 bps (+0.49%) | Continuous proof of reserves | |||
| 40 bps | +304 bps (+3.04%) | Continuous proof of reserves | ||
| 60 bps | +10034 bps (+100.34%) | Continuous proof of reserves |
Lending-market supply summed across all 15 stablecoins of the Mento protocol. Yield pools live on each stablecoin's own page.
No lending market read yet.
A protocol or DAO with no issuing legal entity, where the absence of a licence is the design rather than a gap in our records.
Mento runs two backing models at once. Its documentation states that the Reserve backs the dollar and euro units, USDm and EURm, and that the Reserve holds other issuers' fiat backed stablecoins against them: USDC, USDT and USDS behind the dollar unit, and Circle's EUROC behind the euro one. The second model is a collateralised debt position system that Mento states is forked from Liquity v2, in which a user locks the dollar unit and borrows a currency token against it.
Which token sits in which model is a question about today rather than about the design. The documentation describes the borrowed side as covering GBPm and others, and says most Mento stablecoins are CDP-backed, which is the direction of travel rather than the current state. Mento's reserve dashboard reports where the supply actually sits, and on 2 October 2026 it named three borrowed markets: the pound, yen and Swiss franc units, each collateralised in the dollar unit at more than one and a half times the debt on that reading. The remaining 12 currency tokens, including the dollar and euro units, were counted in the Reserve backed set. The borrowed layer was under 2% of Mento's total supply.
The Reserve itself holds more than the documentation's list. On the same reading the dashboard showed dollar stablecoins at 60.6% of about $20.8 million in holdings, euro stablecoins (EUROP, EURC and bridged EUROC) at 10.5%, and CELO, stETH and ETH at 28.9%.
So a Mento pound is a claim on Mento's dollar unit, and a Mento naira or real is a claim on the same Reserve that stands behind that dollar unit. Neither one is a claim on a bank account holding the currency printed on the ticker, and there was never meant to be one.
That is a coherent design and it is not the design most people assume when they see a local currency ticker. The documentation names the failure modes for the borrowed side plainly: a position can become undercollateralised through movement in the exchange rate, or through the dollar unit losing its own peg. On the Reserve backed side the question is what the Reserve holds, and because it holds other issuers' stablecoins alongside CELO, stETH and ETH, a reader inherits those issuers' disclosure and the price of those assets along with Mento's. A reader evaluating a Mento token is working through one of those two questions rather than the safety of a bank account.
Sources: Mento docs: The Reserve, Mento docs: CDPs, Mento Reserve dashboard, Mento blog: Mento V3 is here (4 March 2026)
Mento's own reserve dashboard publishes the reserve's holdings and a collateralization ratio. It is worth reading what that ratio covers before carrying it to a coin. The documentation defines it as reserve holdings divided by the supply of the Reserve backed stables, so it is one figure for that whole set rather than a statement about any single token. The dashboard does publish a ratio per borrowed market, and that measures something else again: dollar unit collateral locked against what has been borrowed from it.
One consequence for readers comparing coins across this map: a Mento token and a fiat backed token with the same peg are not competing products with different levels of safety. They are different instruments, and a disclosure rating built to measure fiat reserves does not rank them against each other.
Sources: Mento Reserve dashboard, Mento docs: The Reserve, Mento docs: CDPs
Not local currency. Mento's reserve dashboard counts most of its currency tokens against the Reserve, which holds other issuers' dollar and euro stablecoins alongside CELO, stETH and ETH. Its pound, yen and Swiss franc tokens are borrowed against the dollar unit inside a collateralised debt position system forked from Liquity v2. Either way, a Mento naira or pound is backed by dollar and euro assets rather than by naira or pounds.
It operates as a protocol rather than as a fiat issuer. There is no bank relationship behind the tokens, no custodian to name and no reserve account for an outside firm to examine. Its collateral is visible onchain instead, which is a genuine form of transparency and a completely different one from an attestation.
The risks are the ones its own documentation names: a position can become undercollateralised through movement in the exchange rate, or through the dollar unit it is borrowed against losing its peg. Those are the two questions to evaluate. A disclosure rating built to measure fiat reserves does not answer them.
Yes. Its reserve dashboard publishes the Reserve's holdings and one collateralization ratio for the Reserve backed set, plus a separate collateral ratio for each borrowed market, currently GBPm, JPYm and CHFm. Take the ratio for the market you are reading rather than a single headline figure, because those are different measures.
This chart is DeFiLlama circulating supply. The headline figure above is mostly DIA’s onchain reads, with DeFiLlama where DIA does not read, so the last point can differ from it.
Source: DeFiLlama circulating supply Updated